BrownDeerNOW
search all things local
     
Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to MyCommunityNOW - Blogs Sign in | Join

Wake Up! Waukesha

Jay, who has lived in the Waukesha area for nearly 20 years, is an active volunteer who serves on numerous local boards and committees. He’s married to Colleen with three kids having gone through the Waukesha schools. He is the VP of a local distribution company and currently serves on several area Boards.

Could Mother Teresa qualify for Waukesha School Superintendent opening?

By Jay Walt
Wednesday, Jun 4 2008, 10:02 PM

No....Mother Teresa (were she still with us) would not qualify to be the new Waukesha School Superintendent. Nor would Gandhi, the Dalai Lama, and Albert Schweitzer would only make the first round of cuts.

Why would these otherwise kind, great humanitarians not qualify for the Superintendent's position? Because their efforts to promote kindness, compassion, wisdom, and vision were met with acceptance and appreciation. Given the current funding challenges facing the new District regime, any of the aforementioned traits will be discounted by some in the local Waukesha Community as being "not what's needed" right now.

The Waukesha School District continues to face budget cuts every year for a variety of reasons, but primarily because of an extremely flawed State funding formula. These cuts will erode the quality of this District (and many others in the State) unless an intervention occurs - and soon! I would love to believe Mother Teresa has a miracle awaiting us?(she doesn't) Could Gandhi promote Waukesha Community "accord" and togetherness instead of heavily polarized opinions? (no chance at all) Would the Dalai Lama expound philosophically with a subliminal message of hope for future students? (submarinable...submersible...subhumanal...never mind...) Would a Schweitzer "cure" for the State school funding debacle qualify him for a second Nobel Peace Prize? (sorry - someone would say he fixed the State formula just to make himself look good...)  

If the above notables would fall short in many areas needed for this position, what kind of expectations should we hold for the next Waukesha Superintendent?  Let's start with realism and a healthy dose of hope. Add to that a desire for an intelligent, compassionate, dedicated, and concerned approach. Finish with an incredibly thick skin because this Community has demonstrated a curious need to criticize at a level often approaching public humiliation, while never offering a hint of constructive criticism.

The next Superintendent of Schools truly has his or her her work cut out for them.

Maybe Al Gore (After all - he invented the Internet!) would be interested???  

Comments

James Wigderson   

Perhaps you could be more specific to which groups you're referring.

It's hard to understand the point of your criticism without any specifics.

I also don't understand the source of your frustration when you clearly didn't demonstrate it on Tuesday.

June 5, 2008 8:22 PM

Jay Walt   

Frustration? The criteria used by the search firm in their analysis would not, if applied evenly, have allowed for endorsement of anyone - regardless of credentials. Or...one could say that the multiple page, single-space criteria would have allowed for almost anyone. It depends on how it would be used.

There was and is no specificity to the groups I referred to. One has to merely follow local publications with citizen's comments to validate my contention that local criticisms, whether directed toward local pols, the School Board, and/or the departing Superintendent, have often veered towards personal attacks - without constructive criticism.  

June 5, 2008 9:43 PM

James Wigderson   

But then, this isn't very constructive either.  If you're reacting to nothing in particular, the targets of your ire escape any responsibility. You've created and oppose an amorphus "them" to whom nobody belongs.

June 6, 2008 1:54 PM

James Wigderson   

As for the search group, given the format and the timing, did you actually think you were there to have an actual say in the process?  Or was it a classic case of "Let's have a meeting with the possible players so we can claim they had input into our decision."  

So which of you suggested that the community interviews and deliberations be moved to an auditorium so that the community could actually participate?  Did any of you suggest the school board, if they were going to take your input seriously at all, would need more time than a hastily scheduled meeting with no agenda posted on their website?  I'll admit that I was late to the room, but the only objection I remember to not communicating the deliberations to the various groups you represented came from Chris Lufter of the Waukesha Taxpayers League.

See Jay, you were given a time, position, and authority to object.  Instead you rail at unnamed critics of the administration in an unconstructive fashion. You're guilty of exactly what you're accusing unnamed others of doing. The next time you're in that meeting room, and you feel the process is awry, do something about it.

June 6, 2008 2:06 PM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.